Gordon Clark

I am reading a logic book by America's "foremost" theologian. I like it alot, so far. It's a nice brush up after I take my regular logic class every day, and you know, there have been other logicians prior to good ol' Doug and James...gulp* (I wait for the lightning to strike because of blatant heretical rhetoric* but alas, none comes). My principal noted today in Art History that Gordon views logic a little to highly. I realize that Gordon is very persistent in his apologetic for logic, but come on, who wants to read a book that isn't persuasive? I mean, pshh, rather than saying that we study logic because, because, logic is an attribute of God (Wilson, cough*) and for some reason that makes it final, (it actually does, but since Sir Douglas doesnt teach us about enthymemes until exercise 22, how is a moron like myself going to decipher that conclusion?) which is where Monsieur Clark comes into play. Had I read the intro to Clark's book, I would be well versed in the biblical argument pro logic, and had I been exposed to a good Biblical exegesis of John 1:1 the world would have meant so much more and my comprehension of logic would have been snazzy. If Clark's book is this good, I wonder what other logic books by better authors are like. They must be better! Dude, logic is "the crap". Clarks book is all dinky too, I want a drinkin' book, a freaking volume and-a-half. Something that would take 3 good bags of tobaccy. No just kidding about the drinkin' and tobaccy, lest my family view me devilish, but not even Clinton can stop me when I am of age(I already have my pipe model selected, and a nice humidor to boot), therefore (insert "dot" symbol here) Christian liberty is the true meaning of logic. Do you hear the sound? The sound that it makes?

I am so tired